you are looking for and what form your critique might take. Check the sequence of statements in the introduction. Read the results section. Analyse the Text, read the article(s)carefully. And how was each technique performed? If your lecturer has given you specic advice on how to write a critical review, follow that advice. If your instructor has not provided a format for your critique, there are two possible ways you might present. C., and Wright,. Can you come up with any alternative way of interpreting them? If not, the following steps may help you. Step-by-Step Instructions for Reading a Primary Research Article. You may also need to go to supplementary online information files to find some of the results. Discussion Check the interpretation against the results. What is the author's central purpose? The method should define the subjects, instrumentation and apparatus, procedure, and data analysis. How are such data interpreted? Were many other laboratories pursuing related research when the reported work was done? Better patient care and increased professional growth will result when clinicians learn to evaluate and make use of the research e essential elements of a research article are the title, abstract, introduction, method, results, discussion and conclusion. In fact, that's often the only part of a paper that many non-scientists read when they're trying to build a scientific argument. What do the authors think the results mean? If it's the kind of research that tests one or more null hypotheses, identify it/them. Don't yet try to decide what the results mean ; just write down what they are. Do the authors identify any weaknesses in their own study? Body Follow the structure of the journal article. Determine whether the results answer the specific question(s). Evaluate each section of the article Introduction, collected Methods, Results, Discussion highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each section. This can be very useful in writing your critique. Overview Reread the abstract. The introduction should contain the following elements: statement of the problem, literature review, purpose and expected results (hypothesis). Select a review article on a topic that interests you and that is written clearly so you can understand.
Is the narrative sequence of methods clear and pertinent. Analysis and evaluation of published research. What is this paper about, what, s eorts observations. What funding sources met the costs of the research. You are expected to read the article carefully.
Check the methods for aws, how did each result contribute to answering the question or testing the hypothesis raised in the introduction. The type of scientific paper Iapos. After you have read the article and answered the questions in the previous section. You should have a good understanding of the research undertaken. How do you evaluate how to read a journal article critically the signicance of the research. What are the limitations of that work. Are other researchers citing this paper. Followed by its overall value, see Labs how to read a journal article critically 4 and 5 Wood.
It's a peer-reviewed report of new research on a specific question (or questions).(Don't assume they're infallible!) What do they propose to do as a next step?Some institutions (.g., University of Texas) are well-respected; others may appear to be legitimate research institutions but are actually agenda-driven.
© Copyright 2018. "www.ascends.info". All rights reserved.